|
But Mike
Moore, the WTO director general who was visiting Vietnam late
last week, said, "I would be enormously disappointed, I'd
be very disappointed, if we don't see Vietnam at the [WTO]
ministerial conference in two years' time."
Moore said the most important agreement he reached in Hanoi was
to boost negotiations. "The purpose [of the trip] was to
meet with ministers and the Prime Minister to talk about how we
can speed up Vietnam's entry into the WTO," said Moore.
When Vietnam joins the WTO, he said, depends on its answers to
the questions posed by WTO members. Based on China and Brazil's
cases, working out a definite time-frame for Vietnam is a tough
job, said Moore.
"The WTO doesn't negotiate with countries on acceptance,"
he said. "It's not me, it's not an executive decision I can
make, it's the 144 members. So, we are in the middle of the
process now." In general, claimed Moore, Vietnam's
admission speed depended on how fast Vietnam should move as
defined by the Government and on the number of questions posed
to Vietnam. "This of course is in the hands of
Vietnam," he continued. "If Vietnam wants this, and it
does, let's see what we can do to accelerate the procedures.
What Vietnam wants, it should work for."
The WTO chief said, however, that it remained an extremely
difficult task for Vietnam to be admitted, as far as the
procedures are concerned. "You must understand how
difficult this can be in terms of legislation... These are not
easy things to do," Moore told reporters in a news
conference in Hanoi.
For an early admission to the WTO, according to Moore, Vietnam
should answer the questions from WTO members. "The biggest
hindrance is the market access issues as posed by WTO members
and how Vietnam will respond to the questions," he said.
"Vietnam will be fast-tracked for the WTO if this first
market access offer is going in the right direction." Moore
added that these documents, as informed by Prime Minister Phan
Van Khai, had been almost completed and would be sent to the WTO
by the year-end at the latest.
In addition, WTO officials would together with Vietnam identify
the country's weak points whereby the WTO and other
organizations such as the World Bank would enhance Vietnam's
capacities. Moore said the WTO would organize courses, workshops
and other activities to help Vietnam.
The WTO chief said during his meetings with Vietnamese
government officials, the hosts had shown a determination to
join the WTO and cited the historic trade agreement with the
United States passed by Vietnamese lawmakers as "a good
stepping stone."
"The U.S. trade deal is a step forward for Vietnam in its
accession to the WTO," said Moore. "Vietnamese
Government officials are more confident and experienced in
negotiations and I believe the preparations for the documents
are good."
Moore said Vietnam had sent to the international community
signals of economic openness and policy clarity. He warned,
however, that the negotiation process depended on many
industries such as construction, policy implementation, budget,
cross-border trade management, and the like. The WTO was not a
club that organized workshops to which people came, spoke and
then went home, asserted Moore. There must be commitments to
carry out, he concluded.
In a talk with the WTO general director, Prime Minister Khai
said Vietnam needed more help from the WTO to step up its
membership acceptance. Khai said he expected Moore's continued
support during the upcoming fifth round of negotiations for
WTO-Vietnam.
PM Khai said Vietnam was one of the 28 poor nations applying for
WTO membership. Therefore, it needs aid from the global trade
watchdog, especially in simplifying procedures.
Vietnam submitted its application for WTO membership almost six
years ago in early 1995. Ever since, four rounds of talks have
been conducted, mainly on policy transparency and some 1,500
questions by WTO members on Vietnam's trade policies.
The first goods and services offer has been forwarded by the
Trade Minister to the Prime Minister for consideration to
prepare for the fifth round (also the first round of talk on
goods and services) slated for early 2002.
|